Rate: 5.50%
Term: 18 Months, One 6 Month Extension
LTV: 75%
Prepayment: None
Transaction Description:
George Smith Partners arranged $5,880,000 in acquisition land financing for a 18,000 SF vacant lot to be developed into 82 workforce housing units located in the Koreatown area of Los Angeles, CA. The Sponsor is addressing the need for workforce housing in this area of Los Angeles. There is a gap between high housing prices/rent and employee household incomes. This is creating a shortage of affordable housing. The loan represents 75% of the purchase price and is structured with a holdback feature to cover the predevelopment soft costs to bring the Project to permit-ready status. The interest-only land loan was priced at 5.50%, with an 18-month term and one 6-month extension option. The extension option gives flexibility to the Sponsor should they be unable to pull permits within 18 months. There’s additional flexibility with the loan structure because there is no prepayment penalty. Amid market uncertainty, GSP was able to leverage their network to identify land lenders who could provide certainty of execution. Despite being on a strict closing deadline, GSP was able to identify a lender who could close within the required deadline.
Related Financings
-
$3,800,000, 73% LTC Land Loan for Multi-Tenant Spec Industrial; Mesa, AZ
February 9, 2022
Transaction Description:
George Smith Partners arranged $3,800,000 (73% LTC) in non-recourse, bridge financing for the acquisition of two parcels of industrial zoned land in Mesa, Arizona. The Sponsors will develop the land into four multi-tenant, speculative industrial buildings catering to small and mid-sized industrial tenants.
With two weeks remaining in the escrow period, and with the Sponsor’s wish to arrange a non-recourse, high leverage land loan, GSP sourced a lender who was comfortable with the value and was able to close in 8 days while giving credit to the lift of the land’s appreciation during the seller’s escrow period. The loan resulted in 73% loan to cost, which is much higher than standard market leverage. Furthermore, the Lender was willing to go even higher at 78% LTC, but the Sponsors ultimately did not end up needing that much leverage.
All Terms Confidential
- Advisors: Scott Meredith
